From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265539AbUATP2B (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:28:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265560AbUATP2B (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:28:01 -0500 Received: from smtp-out8.blueyonder.co.uk ([195.188.213.11]:1021 "EHLO smtp-out8.blueyonder.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265539AbUATP17 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:27:59 -0500 Subject: Re: APM and ACPI sleep issues with 2.6 From: Ross Burton To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20040121015903.0b4198b0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <1073232351.21389.111.camel@localhost> <20040105140057.096c77f9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1074520065.32688.9.camel@carados.180sw.com> <20040121015903.0b4198b0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1074612332.5520.36.camel@carados.180sw.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:25:32 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jan 2004 15:28:18.0443 (UTC) FILETIME=[07A72DB0:01C3DF6A] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 14:59, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:47:45 +0000 Ross Burton wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 03:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > With 2.6.1-rc1-mm, when I shut the lid with APM enabled nothing > > > > happens. No messages on the console, nothing. > > > > > > Can you try booting with apm=debug and see if you get any messages > > > when you shut the lid. > > > > Sorry for the long delay... > > I was actually wondering if there are any messages beginning with "apm:" Hm, nothing was produced on the console, in dmesg, or in syslog. > > I've been told that building 2.6.1-mm4, making i8042 and atkdb modules > > and unloading them before sleeping should fix this problem. Is that the > > blessed solution? Unloading the modules for the keyboard controller > > does seem a little too much like brute-force for me, especially since > > 2.4.x managed fine. :) > > I am not sure if you need to build i8042 and atkb as modules amy more, I > thought there was a fix applied (in 2.6.1?). However it would be > interesting to the results of removing the modules before suspending. Exactly the same messages... :( Ross -- Ross Burton mail: ross@burtonini.com jabber: ross@burtonini.com www: http://www.burtonini.com./ PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF