From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265468AbUBAVJR (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 16:09:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265478AbUBAVJQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 16:09:16 -0500 Received: from elpis.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.40]:12436 "EHLO elpis.telenet-ops.be") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265468AbUBAVJL (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 16:09:11 -0500 Subject: Re: Uptime counter From: Ludootje To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Markus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=E4stbacka?= In-Reply-To: <20040201205115.GS2259@mea-ext.zmailer.org> References: <20040201205115.GS2259@mea-ext.zmailer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Message-Id: <1075673274.4047.8.camel@gax.mynet> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 22:07:54 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 20:51, Matti Aarnio wrote: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 10:41:41PM +0200, Markus Hästbacka wrote: > > Hi list, > > I wonder does any kernel branch have a uptime counter that doesn't stop > > counting at 497 days? Or is a patch needed for the job to > > 2.{0,2,4,6} kernel? > > Any 64 bit machine since day 1, but also 2.6 at i386 does work. > > > Markus > > /Matti Aarnio It's the first time I hear about the uptime being resetted after 497 days, why is this? Is this a mistake or are their reasons for it? Thanks, Ludootje