From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262603AbUBDQIl (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:08:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262848AbUBDQIl (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:08:41 -0500 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.131]:25588 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262603AbUBDQIk (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:08:40 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6 probe.c "pcibus_class" Device Class, release function From: John Rose To: colpatch@us.ibm.com Cc: greg KH , lkml In-Reply-To: <1075910444.3026.0.camel@verve> References: <1075847619.28337.31.camel@verve> <40204B7E.6030408@us.ibm.com> <1075910444.3026.0.camel@verve> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1075910719.3026.2.camel@verve> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 10:05:19 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Oops - quick question. Does unregistering blow away the cpuaffinity attr and the bridge symlink? Thanks- John On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 10:00, John Rose wrote: > > put() does need to be > > called twice because the bridge device is get()'d twice: once when the > > device is registered and once when it's bus device grabs a reference to it. > > Looks great, thanks Matt. > > John