From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266584AbUBDVrH (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:47:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266630AbUBDVrH (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:47:07 -0500 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.131]:45563 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266584AbUBDVrC (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:47:02 -0500 Subject: Re: [Bug 2013] New: Oops from create_dir (sysfs) From: John Rose To: Greg KH Cc: lkml In-Reply-To: <20040204212253.GA3897@kroah.com> References: <1075926442.3026.37.camel@verve> <20040204204811.GA3992@us.ibm.com> <1075928072.3026.47.camel@verve> <20040204212253.GA3897@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1075931022.3026.63.camel@verve> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 15:43:42 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org . That's one way to shut me up :) In all seriousness, how much of a performance problem would be posed by throwing a kset_find_obj() check somewhere in the beginning of kobject_add()? Thanks- John On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 15:22, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 02:54:32PM -0600, John Rose wrote: > > > The kobject code quickly pointed out the flaw in your code. > > > > That it did, but an "already exists" return code from kobject_add would > > have pointed it out more quickly :) > > Patches are always gladly accepted :) > > thanks, > > greg k-h