From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Keith Mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 2019] New: Bug from the mm subsystem involving X (fwd)
Date: 06 Feb 2004 01:57:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1076061476.27855.1144.camel@nighthawk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98220000.1076051821@[10.10.2.4]>
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 23:17, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> + #ifdef CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ
> + #include <asm/numaq.h>
> + #else /* summit or generic arch */
> + #include <asm/srat.h>
> + #endif
> +#else /* !CONFIG_NUMA */
> + #define get_memcfg_numa get_memcfg_numa_flat
> + #define get_zholes_size(n) (0)
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
We ran into a bug with #ifdefs like this before. It was fixed in some
of the code that you're trying to remove.
It's not safe to assume that NUMA && !NUMAQ means SUMMIT. Remember the
linking errors we got when we turned CONFIG_NUMA on with the regular PC
config? The generic arch wasn't a problem because it sets
CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT and compiles in the summit code, but the regular PC
code doesn't.
Also, I don't think we need the #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA around the whole
block. How about something like this?
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ
#include <asm/numaq.h>
#elif CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT
#include <asm/srat.h>
#else
#define get_memcfg_numa get_memcfg_numa_flat
#define get_zholes_size(n) (0)
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +static inline int pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> + return(physnode_map[(pfn) / PAGES_PER_ELEMENT]);
> +#else
> + return 0;
> +#endif
> +}
Looks like somebody pasted that in from a macro. "(pfn)" :)
--dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-06 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-04 23:17 [Bugme-new] [Bug 2019] New: Bug from the mm subsystem involving X (fwd) Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-04 23:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-05 0:12 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-05 0:36 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-05 0:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-05 0:56 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-05 1:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-05 1:56 ` Keith Mannthey
2004-02-05 2:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-05 2:33 ` Keith Mannthey
2004-02-05 2:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-06 7:17 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 7:19 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 9:57 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2004-02-06 15:49 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 17:22 ` Dave Hansen
2004-02-06 19:59 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 20:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-06 21:18 ` Martin J. Bligh
[not found] <51080000.1075936626@flay.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402041539470.2086@home.osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <60330000.1075939958@flay.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <64260000.1075941399@flay.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402041639420.2086@home.osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20040204165620.3d608798.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402041719300.2086@home.osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <1075946211.13163.18962.camel@dyn318004bld.beaverton.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402041800320.2086@home.osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <98220000.1076051821@[10.10.2.4].suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <1076061476.27855.1144.camel@nighthawk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <5450000.1076082574@[10.10.2.4].suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <1076088169.29478.2928.camel@nighthawk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <218650000.1076097590@flay.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402061215030.30672@home.osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <220850000.1076102320@flay.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-02-07 3:54 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-07 4:49 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-07 5:21 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-07 6:37 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-07 7:31 ` Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1076061476.27855.1144.camel@nighthawk \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox