From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 11:17:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10763.1304349435@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 May 2011 13:13:37 +0200." <20110502111337.GA15769@sepie.suse.cz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 460 bytes --]
On Mon, 02 May 2011 13:13:37 +0200, Michal Marek said:
> +# We test for support of the -Wunused-but-set-variable option, because
> +# some version of gcc will happily accept any -Wno-* switch and complain
> +# later during build.
> +ifeq ($(call cc-option-yn, -Wunused-but-set-variable), y)
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-unused-but-set-variable
> +endif
Do we need to do this more generically for all the other -Wno-foo
options under the various W={123} options?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-02 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-02 2:18 linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 2:24 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-02 3:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 4:02 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-02 4:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 4:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 4:36 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-02 5:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 4:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 11:13 ` Michal Marek
2011-05-02 12:13 ` [PATCH] kbuild: Fix passing -Wno-* options to gcc 4.4+ Michal Marek
2011-05-03 0:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-03 8:52 ` Michal Marek
2011-05-02 15:17 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2011-05-02 15:31 ` linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree Michal Marek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-07-30 6:40 Stephen Rothwell
2025-08-05 3:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-06 4:01 Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-07 5:38 ` Masahiro Yamada
2025-05-26 8:03 Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-03 23:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-04 1:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-09-09 0:54 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-03 23:13 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-28 4:57 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-28 17:28 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-08-19 23:28 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-23 0:25 ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-12-20 22:10 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-09 9:30 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-09 13:01 ` Dominique Martinet
2020-12-09 20:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-10 6:47 ` Dominique Martinet
2020-12-14 20:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-10 22:52 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-11 0:22 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-12-11 16:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-30 23:06 Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-01 2:00 ` Nicholas Piggin
2010-12-23 0:00 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-30 0:52 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-30 20:24 ` Michal Marek
2010-09-30 0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-30 20:25 ` Michal Marek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10763.1304349435@localhost \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).