From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S265956AbUBJTKc (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:10:32 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265913AbUBJTKb
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:10:31 -0500
Received: from CPE-24-163-213-29.mn.rr.com ([24.163.213.29]:56784 "EHLO
	www.enodev.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265956AbUBJTK1
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:10:27 -0500
Subject: Re: devfs vs udev, thoughts from a devfs user
From: Shawn <core@enodev.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Mike Bell <kernel@mikebell.org>,
       "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040210172552.GB27779@kroah.com>
References: <20040210113417.GD4421@tinyvaio.nome.ca>
	 <20040210170157.GA27421@kroah.com> <20040210171337.GK4421@tinyvaio.nome.ca>
	 <20040210172552.GB27779@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1076440225.27936.5.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:10:26 -0600
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

You know better than to say you're done. I've run out of fingers and
toes trying to count the number of times you've tried to say that.

Sadly, there are those that will stir things up enough to get a
response.

I think it's because you're very helpful and actually want to improve
things and know how maybe?

On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 11:25, Greg KH wrote:
> Anyway, I'm done with this devfs vs. udev arguments that in the end go
> nowhere.  See that document for my position.