From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dm core patches
Date: 13 Feb 2004 11:44:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1076690681.2158.54.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
> The mechanism is in place, but the SCSI stack still needs a few changes
> to pass down the correct errors. The easiest would be to pass down
> pseudo-sense keys (I'd rather just call them something else as not to
> confuse things, io error hints or something) to
> end_that_request_first(), changing uptodate from a bool to a hint.
Yes, I'm ready to do this in SCSI. I think the uptodate field should
include at least two (and possibly three) failure type indications:
- fatal: error cannot be retried
- retryable: error may be retried
and possibly
- informational: This is dangerous, since it's giving information about
a transaction that actually succeeded (i.e. we'd need to fix drivers to
recognise it as being uptodate but with info, like sector remapped)
Then, we also have a error origin indication:
- device: The device is actually reporting the problem
- transport: the error is a transport error
- driver: the error comes from the device driver.
So dm would know that fatal transport or driver errors could be
repathed, but fatal device errors probably couldn't.
Any that I've missed?
James
next reply other threads:[~2004-02-13 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-13 16:44 James Bottomley [this message]
2004-02-16 8:22 ` dm core patches Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-16 16:57 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-16 17:04 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-19 0:26 ` Mike Christie
2004-02-19 3:40 ` Jeff Garzik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-10 16:35 Joe Thornber
2004-02-11 10:16 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-11 10:35 ` Joe Thornber
2004-02-12 18:51 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-12 20:13 ` Joe Thornber
2004-02-13 15:12 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-13 15:39 ` Joe Thornber
2004-02-13 16:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-02-16 8:19 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-16 9:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-02-13 23:46 ` Mike Anderson
2004-02-16 12:17 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2004-02-13 16:03 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1076690681.2158.54.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox