From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267750AbUBRSRp (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:17:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267751AbUBRSRp (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:17:45 -0500 Received: from 64.221.211.208.ptr.us.xo.net ([64.221.211.208]:31687 "HELO mail.keyresearch.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S267750AbUBRSRn (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:17:43 -0500 Subject: Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64 From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" To: Diego Calleja =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Garc=EDa?= Cc: Mikael Pettersson , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20040218153123.2fa8ab42.diegocg@teleline.es> References: <16435.14044.182718.134404@alkaid.it.uu.se> <20040218153123.2fa8ab42.diegocg@teleline.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <1077128253.12208.5.camel@serpentine.pathscale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:17:34 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 06:31, Diego Calleja GarcĂ­a wrote: > Does that mean that the opteron-based distros will be able to run > their x86-64 kernelspace/userspace in intel micros without modifications, > or only the userspace? Presumably there will be some minor kernel modifications needed, but Intel's public position is that going forward, there's only one 64-bit kernel and userspace needed for both platforms.