From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
rathamahata@php4.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gluk@php4.ru,
anton@megashop.ru, mfedyk@matchmail.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.1 IO lockup on SMP systems
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:37:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1077809851.4443.4.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040226143710.GA3157@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 560 bytes --]
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 15:37, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 05:11:35AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Not sure why the oom-killer didn't do anything.
> >
> > There's still free swap space. The oom-killer has problems.
>
> That sounds odd. Surely if we have free swap, we don't
> want the oom-killer to do anything ?
with highmem it's not so easy :)
the lowzone can be entirely pinned by pagetables and such and the
highmem zone can be free... and still you want to oomkill.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-26 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-31 16:40 2.6.1 IO lockup on SMP systems Sergey S. Kostyliov
2004-02-01 0:17 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-21 16:45 ` Sergey S. Kostyliov
2004-02-21 19:30 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-22 17:39 ` Alexander Y. Fomichev
2004-02-23 17:27 ` Sergey S. Kostyliov
2004-02-23 21:30 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-24 11:56 ` Sergey S. Kostyliov
2004-02-23 22:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-24 7:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-02-24 6:53 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-24 11:54 ` Sergey S. Kostyliov
2004-02-26 12:19 ` Sergey S. Kostyliov
2004-02-26 12:53 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-26 13:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-26 14:37 ` Dave Jones
2004-02-26 15:37 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2004-02-26 14:30 ` Sergey S. Kostyliov
2004-02-26 20:03 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-28 14:56 ` Sergey S. Kostyliov
2004-04-08 9:08 ` 2.6.X kernel memory leak? (was: Re: 2.6.1 IO lockup on SMP systems) Sergey S. Kostyliov
2004-04-09 7:17 ` 2.6.X kernel memory leak? Sergey S. Kostyliov
2004-04-09 9:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-09 12:15 ` Sergey S. Kostyliov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1077809851.4443.4.camel@laptop.fenrus.com \
--to=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@megashop.ru \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=gluk@php4.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=rathamahata@php4.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox