public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Egger <de@axiros.com>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.25: Get rid of obsolete LMC driver
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:01:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1077991287.24150.423.camel@sonja> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040228144635.A25545@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1441 bytes --]

Am Sam, den 28.02.2004 schrieb Francois Romieu um 14:46:

> Shall one understand that:
> - in-kernel LMC driver has been proved dysfunctionnal ?

Hard to tell. Standard Raw HDLC mode works fine but I couldn't find the
correct tools to setup PPP instead. And SBE support is not really
helpful unless you're using their drivers, which had been recently
updated to a version that actually works with late 2.4 kernels.

> - SBE code will be turned into something adequate for kernel integration ?

Their package consists of tools, a patch and a standalone module source.
Depending on the kernel version the patch needs to be applied, but it
should be in the latest kernels already. The source can be compiled
against any kernel tree and works reasonably well. It probably could be
integrated into the kernel, however given the attitude of SBE and the
senselessness of the rename and some other changes I don't see a good
reason why the community should help them by doing their homework.

Unless there's a reliable driver with working tools I don't see a good
reason to have this driver around. It already bit me hard in the rear
and I'd rather see someone bitch against SBE because their driver is not
working than hunt hours for mistakes and eventually end up with SBE
anyway.

Other than that I've learnt my lesson and selfish as I am, I will not
take it further than I already did.

-- 
Servus,
       Daniel

[-- Attachment #2: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-28 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-28 12:41 [PATCH] 2.4.25: Get rid of obsolete LMC driver Daniel Egger
2004-02-28 13:46 ` Francois Romieu
2004-02-28 18:01   ` Daniel Egger [this message]
2004-02-28 16:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-28 18:01   ` Daniel Egger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1077991287.24150.423.camel@sonja \
    --to=de@axiros.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
    --cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox