From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261951AbUB2ABb (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:01:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261952AbUB2ABb (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:01:31 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:37309 "EHLO gate.crashing.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261951AbUB2ABa (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:01:30 -0500 Subject: Re: Dropping CONFIG_PM_DISK? From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Pavel Machek Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel list , Patrick Mochel In-Reply-To: <20040228230039.GA246@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20040228230039.GA246@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1078012320.906.9.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 10:52:01 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 10:00, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > Would there be any major screaming if I tried to drop CONFIG_PM_DISK? > It seems noone is maintaining it, equivalent functionality is provided > by swsusp, and it is confusing users... Except that pmdisk code is +/- readable, swsusp is not... Ben.