From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261651AbUCFLLI (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Mar 2004 06:11:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261650AbUCFLLI (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Mar 2004 06:11:08 -0500 Received: from amsfep16-int.chello.nl ([213.46.243.26]:29007 "EHLO amsfep16-int.chello.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261651AbUCFLK4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Mar 2004 06:10:56 -0500 Subject: Re: NFS problems with 2.6.4-rc1-mm2 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Andrew Morton Cc: Trond Myklebust , LKML In-Reply-To: <20040305143727.5397d76e.akpm@osdl.org> References: <1078430862.3793.5.camel@twins> <1078500855.3809.12.camel@twins> <20040305143727.5397d76e.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-fAs5IOJGQ+tiq81UY66k" Message-Id: <1078571454.3811.3.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 12:10:54 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-fAs5IOJGQ+tiq81UY66k Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The bad guy is:=20 nfs-tunable-rpc-slot-table.patch without that patch nfs works fine for me. As said I use NFSv3 over TCP, and its a SMP machine that has the problem, I haven't tried any UP box. Peter On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 23:37, Andrew Morton wrote: > Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > I played about a bit and it's in one of these patches: > >=20 > > #nfs-remove-XID-spinlock.patch > > #nfs-misc-rpc-fixes.patch > > #nfs-improved-writeback-strategy.patch > > #nfs-simplify-config-options.patch > > #nfs-fix-msync.patch > > #nfs-mount-return-useful-errors.patch > > #nfs-misc-minor-fixes.patch > > #nfs-lockd-sync-01.patch > > #nfs-lockd-sync-02.patch > > #nfs-lockd-sync-03.patch > > #nfs-lockd-sync-04.patch > > #nfs-rpc-remove-redundant-memset.patch > > #nfs-tunable-rpc-slot-table.patch > > #nfs-short-read-fix.patch > >=20 > > I'll do a binary search through these patches and report those that see= m > > to cause the problem. >=20 > Thanks, that would be muchly appreciated. --=-fAs5IOJGQ+tiq81UY66k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBASbG+tCb2m4B45HIRAhzqAJ44EHXClVxw1G7BUdd2u0/CII9qqQCff+/v Dk16abB5fqq5Cyzn0fmjiM4= =f3n0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-fAs5IOJGQ+tiq81UY66k--