From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ppc/ppc64 and x86 vsyscalls
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:33:13 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1078867992.9745.25.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <404E33A7.6070800@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 08:14, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> You can create one "big" DSO which covers all the configured processors.
> Then at kernel start time, you determine the actual processor and
> adjust the symbol table offsets to point to the correct version. There
> is no requirement that the table used is identical to the one on disk.
> It's loaded into ordinary memory which can be modified.
Ah, interesting.
> The tricky part of this would be to determine the symbol table slots.
> But even this is quite simple. Just locate the symbol table in the
> ELF-way, then iterate over the entries and use strcmp() for the names
> and act upon match. What you shouldn't do is to generate pointer to the
> symbol table entries somewhere. This is probably fragile and not worth
> the few cycles you'll save.
Yes, make sense. I can "pre" prepare bth 32 and 64 bits DSOs at kernel
start time, then I just have to map them. I suppose I should layout my
DSO in such a way:
/* In one place the actual function implementation */
function_A_vers_1()
function_A_vers_2()
function_A_vers_3()
function_B_vers_1()
function_B_vers_2()
etc .../...
/* Then, some empty "stubs" for the symbol table that gets really
* linked into user binaries. Those are the symbol table entries
* that get patched
*/
function_A() {}
function_B() {}
Sounds right ? It's not completely obvious how I'll do to also map the
64 bits versions of these in the kernel address space, but I can find
a trick.
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-09 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-08 1:17 ppc/ppc64 and x86 vsyscalls Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-03-09 8:05 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-09 11:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-03-09 21:14 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-09 21:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2004-03-10 0:35 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-10 2:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1078867992.9745.25.camel@gaston \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox