From: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>
To: linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: corliss@digitalmages.com, riel@redhat.com,
tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de, jerj@coplanar.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.x BSD Process Accounting w/High UID
Date: 09 Mar 2004 20:59:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1078883951.2232.501.camel@cube> (raw)
> We might, however, put the magic into the implicit padding
> of ac_flag (ugly, since this would require an arch dependant
> definition of stuct acct), or put it into the uppermost
> three bits of ac_flag itself
First of all, none of this matters much if the format
is given a sysctl. The old format is default for now,
and the new one is default (only?) in a couple years.
Sun appears to have done something like this.
When fixing it, note that a 5-bit binary exponent
with denormals would beat the current float format.
Regarding the existing struct though...
Let's take a close look at this. I think there are 2 bytes
of padding on all Linux ports, and another 2 available
on everything except maybe m68k and/or arm. (that is, ports
that will put a u32 on any u16 boundry) Here is the current
struct, compactly formatted with 64-bit blocking:
struct linux_acct {
char ac_flag; // Flags
// 1 pad byte
__u16 ac_uid; // Real User ID
__u16 ac_gid; // Real Group ID
__u16 ac_tty; // Control Terminal
__u32 ac_btime; // Process Creation Time
comp_t ac_utime; // User Time
comp_t ac_stime; // System Time
comp_t ac_etime; // Elapsed Time
comp_t ac_mem; // Average Memory Usage
comp_t ac_io; // Chars Transferred
comp_t ac_rw; // Blocks Read or Written
comp_t ac_minflt; // Minor Pagefaults
comp_t ac_majflt; // Major Pagefaults
comp_t ac_swaps; // Number of Swaps
// 2 pad bytes (except m68k or arm maybe?)
__u32 ac_exitcode; // Exitcode
// hppa might pad this
char ac_comm[17]; // Command Name
// hppa might pad this
char ac_pad[10]; // Padding Bytes
// 1 pad byte (maybe 6 for hppa)
};
Just a sec... ARRRGH WHY DO PEOPLE LEAVE PADDING AND
GENERALLY MIS-ALIGN THINGS ALL THE TIME??????
So there you go. You have a pad byte after ac_flag
at a known location, and a pad byte after ac_pad that
might move a bit due to mis-alignments above it.
next reply other threads:[~2004-03-10 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-10 1:59 Albert Cahalan [this message]
2004-03-10 9:08 ` [PATCH] 2.6.x BSD Process Accounting w/High UID Tim Schmielau
2004-03-10 16:41 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-03-10 17:28 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-03-10 17:47 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-03-10 22:09 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-03-11 0:55 ` Tim Schmielau
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-04 18:04 Arthur Corliss
2004-03-04 19:51 ` Rik van Riel
2004-03-04 20:39 ` Arthur Corliss
2004-03-04 21:54 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-03-04 22:33 ` Arthur Corliss
2004-03-09 16:16 ` Jeremy Jackson
2004-03-09 18:22 ` Tim Schmielau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1078883951.2232.501.camel@cube \
--to=albert@users.sf.net \
--cc=corliss@digitalmages.com \
--cc=jerj@coplanar.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox