public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>
To: linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: corliss@digitalmages.com, riel@redhat.com,
	tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de, jerj@coplanar.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.x BSD Process Accounting w/High UID
Date: 09 Mar 2004 20:59:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1078883951.2232.501.camel@cube> (raw)

> We might, however, put the magic into the implicit padding
> of ac_flag (ugly, since this would require an arch dependant
> definition of stuct acct), or put it into the uppermost
> three bits of ac_flag itself

First of all, none of this matters much if the format
is given a sysctl. The old format is default for now,
and the new one is default (only?) in a couple years.
Sun appears to have done something like this.

When fixing it, note that a 5-bit binary exponent
with denormals would beat the current float format.

Regarding the existing struct though...

Let's take a close look at this. I think there are 2 bytes
of padding on all Linux ports, and another 2 available
on everything except maybe m68k and/or arm. (that is, ports
that will put a u32 on any u16 boundry) Here is the current
struct, compactly formatted with 64-bit blocking:

struct linux_acct {
        char   ac_flag;        // Flags
// 1 pad byte
        __u16  ac_uid;         // Real User ID    
        __u16  ac_gid;         // Real Group ID      
        __u16  ac_tty;         // Control Terminal

        __u32  ac_btime;       // Process Creation Time
        comp_t ac_utime;       // User Time     
        comp_t ac_stime;       // System Time

        comp_t ac_etime;       // Elapsed Time
        comp_t ac_mem;         // Average Memory Usage
        comp_t ac_io;          // Chars Transferred
        comp_t ac_rw;          // Blocks Read or Written

        comp_t ac_minflt;      // Minor Pagefaults   
        comp_t ac_majflt;      // Major Pagefaults  
        comp_t ac_swaps;       // Number of Swaps
// 2 pad bytes (except m68k or arm maybe?)

        __u32  ac_exitcode;    // Exitcode
// hppa might pad this
        char   ac_comm[17];    // Command Name    
// hppa might pad this
        char   ac_pad[10];     // Padding Bytes
// 1 pad byte (maybe 6 for hppa)
};

Just a sec... ARRRGH WHY DO PEOPLE LEAVE PADDING AND
GENERALLY MIS-ALIGN THINGS ALL THE TIME??????

So there you go. You have a pad byte after ac_flag
at a known location, and a pad byte after ac_pad that
might move a bit due to mis-alignments above it.



             reply	other threads:[~2004-03-10  1:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-10  1:59 Albert Cahalan [this message]
2004-03-10  9:08 ` [PATCH] 2.6.x BSD Process Accounting w/High UID Tim Schmielau
2004-03-10 16:41   ` Albert Cahalan
2004-03-10 17:28     ` Tim Schmielau
2004-03-10 17:47     ` Tim Schmielau
2004-03-10 22:09       ` Albert Cahalan
2004-03-11  0:55         ` Tim Schmielau
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-04 18:04 Arthur Corliss
2004-03-04 19:51 ` Rik van Riel
2004-03-04 20:39   ` Arthur Corliss
2004-03-04 21:54     ` Tim Schmielau
2004-03-04 22:33       ` Arthur Corliss
2004-03-09 16:16         ` Jeremy Jackson
2004-03-09 18:22           ` Tim Schmielau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1078883951.2232.501.camel@cube \
    --to=albert@users.sf.net \
    --cc=corliss@digitalmages.com \
    --cc=jerj@coplanar.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox