From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
To: Richard Browning <richard@redline.org.uk>
Cc: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: SMP + Hyperthreading / Asus PCDL Deluxe / Kernel 2.4.x 2.6.x / Crash/Freeze
Date: 12 Mar 2004 01:27:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1079072878.3885.33.camel@dhcppc4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200403120042.32166.richard@redline.org.uk>
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 19:42, Richard Browning wrote:
> On Friday 12 March 2004 00:36, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Richard Browning wrote:
> > > > For my own curiosity, does switching the processors around do anything?
> > > > Those MCEs look confined to the non bootstrap processor package.
> > >
> > > Switched CPUs. This time I get the following:
> > >
> > > CPU3: Machine Check Exception: 000.0004
> > > CPU2: Machine Check Exception: 000.0004
> > > Bank 0: a20000008c010400
> > > Kernel Panic: CPU context corrupt
> > > In idle task - not syncing
> > >
> > > Note that the CPU# designations are swapped and that there's only one
> > > Bank 0: message. Is this significant?
> >
> > Ok, but that's still on the same package so it's not moving with the
> > processor, thanks. Could you also supply processor info from
> > /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> I suppose that's good (for me); indicates no hardware error?
MCE == hardware error.
In this case un-recoverable.
I'll take a swing at decoding this, call the Coast Guard if I don't
return in 30 minutes;-)
http://developer.intel.com/design/pentium4/manuals/25366813.pdf
> Machine Check Exception: 000.0004
fig 14-4 says this means that indeed, you have a valid MCE.
> Bank 0: a20000008c010400
fig 14-6 says:
63: valid register contents
61: UC -- processor did not correct the error
57: PCC -- Processor context corrupt (you're dead)
0400 is the MCA error code
fig E2 says
10 - internal watchdog timeout.
26,27 -- TT -- Thread timeout indicator -- both threads timed out
> /proc/cpuinfo of course:
>
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 15
> model : 2
I have no idea what causes this error, but it sure sounds specific to
the processor, and specific to HT -- which matches your experiments.
I'd imagine that after you verify that you've got the latest BIOS for
the board and the error persists that you should look into getting that
specific processor replaced.
cheers,
-Len
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-12 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <A6974D8E5F98D511BB910002A50A6647615F4B99@hdsmsx402.hd.intel.com>
2004-03-11 6:50 ` SMP + Hyperthreading / Asus PCDL Deluxe / Kernel 2.4.x 2.6.x / Crash/Freeze Len Brown
2004-03-11 13:38 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-11 18:19 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-11 22:17 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-03-12 0:22 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-12 0:36 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-03-12 0:42 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-12 6:27 ` Len Brown [this message]
2004-03-12 7:07 ` Len Brown
2004-03-12 8:24 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-18 3:01 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-20 14:33 ` ANYONE? " Richard Browning
2004-03-20 17:26 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-20 21:30 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-03-21 3:41 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-21 3:33 ` Horst von Brand
2004-03-21 20:32 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-21 23:33 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-03-22 1:04 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-22 7:25 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-03-24 4:01 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-24 7:15 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
[not found] ` <1080214330.982.10.camel@sven>
[not found] ` <200403251304.56877.richard@redline.org.uk>
2004-03-25 22:47 ` Sven Dowideit
2004-03-26 0:36 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-21 14:46 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-03-21 14:57 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-12 1:16 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-10 12:27 Richard Browning
2004-03-10 16:10 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-03-11 13:04 ` Richard Browning
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1079072878.3885.33.camel@dhcppc4 \
--to=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@redline.org.uk \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=zwane@linuxpower.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox