Re: 2.6.4-mm1

Andrew Morton
2004-03-14T08:31:28Z

"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com> wrote:
>
> I checked and tried several things, and I think CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR is
> a red herring. 2.6.4-mm1 did boot with CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR = Y or N as
> long as kernel preemption is disabled. It did not boot regardless of
> CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR if kernel preemption is enabled. I see the
> complaints
> bad: scheduling while atomic!
> at various spots.

Please delete the spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); five lines from the
end of fs/mpage.c.

I assume Subodh did that, but all we know is that it "doesn't boot".