public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dealing with swsusp vs. pmdisk
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:01:33 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1079395292.2302.191.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1079381114.5349.62.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au>


> - Freezer hooks (I can easily get suspend2 working with the old freezer
> until people are convinced it's not up to the task). This accounts for
> the vast majority of those file changes.

It would be nice if you did that as a first step indeed. I'm personally
not convinced of the usefullness of having a freezer at all ;)

> - Changes in vmscan to separate out freeing a single LRU page. When
> reading/writing an image, suspend shots down pages added to the LRU list
> as a result of it's activities, so as to keep the contents of the LRU
> the same as at the start of the cycle. I reckon this might be done by
> stopping the pages from being added to the LRU in the first place, but
> haven't gotten around to asking whether this can be safely done. (The
> current method works, so I haven't made it a priority before now). Short
> summary: I freely admit this is ugly and could be done less invasively,
> especially with help from some of the MM guys.
> - I still have to get the console stuff using file descriptors for I/O
> rather than direct calls; I have code there, but it's not being used yet
> because it worked and then got broken. (Shouldn't take much to fix).

Some of the "guard" code you added to the filesystem is scary too..

Ben.



  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-16  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-12 22:46 Dealing with swsusp vs. pmdisk Pavel Machek
2004-03-13  0:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-03-13  2:51   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-03-13 12:36     ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-13 22:19       ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-14  0:18       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-03-14  0:37         ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-15 20:05           ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-16  0:01             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2004-03-15 23:31               ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-16  1:40                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-03-15 23:59                   ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-16 10:09                   ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-13 12:28   ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-15 23:17     ` Jan Rychter
2004-03-16 18:16       ` Kevin Fenzi, Kevin Fenzi
2004-03-18 10:21     ` Jan Rychter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1079395292.2302.191.camel@gaston \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ncunningham@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox