From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
To: "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" <PrakashKC@gmx.de>
Cc: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@web.de>,
ross@datscreative.com.au,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1
Date: 19 Mar 2004 18:20:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1079738422.7279.308.camel@dhcppc4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <405B4893.70701@gmx.de>
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 14:22, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
> Hmm, I just did a cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/power:
> active state: C1
> default state: C1
> bus master activity: 00000000
> states:
> *C1: promotion[--] demotion[--] latency[000]
> usage[00000000]
> C2: <not supported>
> C3: <not supported>
>
> I am currently NOT using APIC mode (nforce2, as well) and using vanilla
> 2.6.4. It seems C1 halt state isn't used, which exlains why I am having
> trouble to keep my CPU cooler these day. I once started a thread
> suspecting acpi timer, but it is not the case. It seems to be something
> else. As I don't use PIC, it cannot be that 8259-timer-ack-fix.patch
> causin git, or can it? Maybe something broken in ACPI? I might try out
> older kernels to find out...
>
> Prakash
Actually I think it is that we don't _count_ C1 usage.
cheers,
-Len
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-19 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-18 0:19 idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1 Ross Dickson
2004-03-18 1:02 ` Craig Bradney
2004-03-18 11:41 ` Bernd Schubert
2004-03-18 11:55 ` Ross Dickson
2004-03-19 18:55 ` Thomas Schlichter
2004-03-19 19:22 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-19 23:20 ` Len Brown [this message]
2004-03-20 9:29 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-20 10:19 ` Ross Dickson
2004-03-20 10:25 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-20 10:50 ` Ross Dickson
2004-03-29 19:59 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-30 0:57 ` Ross Dickson
2004-03-30 9:30 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-20 13:07 ` Daniel Egger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-17 21:26 Thomas Schlichter
[not found] <A6974D8E5F98D511BB910002A50A6647615F571D@hdsmsx402.hd.intel.com>
2004-03-17 15:53 ` Len Brown
[not found] <200403032119.58817.thomas.schlichter@web.de>
2004-03-17 15:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-03-04 12:47 Thomas Schlichter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1079738422.7279.308.camel@dhcppc4 \
--to=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=PrakashKC@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
--cc=ross@datscreative.com.au \
--cc=thomas.schlichter@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox