* nbd-server?
@ 2004-03-29 5:39 Robert L. Harris
2004-03-29 5:47 ` nbd-server? khandelw
2004-03-29 7:15 ` nbd-server? Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert L. Harris @ 2004-03-29 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux-Kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 555 bytes --]
I'm looking at messing with network block devices and found 2 "servers"
in the debian unstable tree. "nbd-server" and "enbd" (enhanced network
block device support). Is either one better than the other?
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
@ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
With Dreams To Be A King First One Should Be A Man
- Manowar
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: nbd-server?
2004-03-29 5:39 nbd-server? Robert L. Harris
@ 2004-03-29 5:47 ` khandelw
2004-03-29 7:15 ` nbd-server? Eric W. Biederman
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: khandelw @ 2004-03-29 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert L. Harris; +Cc: Linux-Kernel
Some of my friends were fiddling around with it some time back. AFAIR enbd
-server is a user level process were as nbd was in the kernel.
Quoting "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net>:
>
>
> I'm looking at messing with network block devices and found 2 "servers"
> in the debian unstable tree. "nbd-server" and "enbd" (enhanced network
> block device support). Is either one better than the other?
>
> :wq!
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
> @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
> DISCLAIMER:
> These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
>
> With Dreams To Be A King First One Should Be A Man
> - Manowar
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: nbd-server?
2004-03-29 5:39 nbd-server? Robert L. Harris
2004-03-29 5:47 ` nbd-server? khandelw
@ 2004-03-29 7:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-03-29 17:03 ` nbd-server? Barry K. Nathan
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2004-03-29 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert L. Harris; +Cc: Linux-Kernel
"Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net> writes:
> I'm looking at messing with network block devices and found 2 "servers"
> in the debian unstable tree. "nbd-server" and "enbd" (enhanced network
> block device support). Is either one better than the other?
nbd is simple and works. I have managed to at least oops both enbd
and drbd. They have more features but...
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: nbd-server?
2004-03-29 7:15 ` nbd-server? Eric W. Biederman
@ 2004-03-29 17:03 ` Barry K. Nathan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Barry K. Nathan @ 2004-03-29 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman; +Cc: Robert L. Harris, Linux-Kernel
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 12:15:56AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> nbd is simple and works. I have managed to at least oops both enbd
> and drbd. They have more features but...
I hadn't heard of drbd before, but my experience with enbd has also been
worse than my experience with nbd.
-Barry K. Nathan <barryn@pobox.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-29 17:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-29 5:39 nbd-server? Robert L. Harris
2004-03-29 5:47 ` nbd-server? khandelw
2004-03-29 7:15 ` nbd-server? Eric W. Biederman
2004-03-29 17:03 ` nbd-server? Barry K. Nathan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox