From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH - take 2] knfsd: nfsd: Handle ERESTARTSYS from syscalls.
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:11:09 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1080619001109.24338@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080619101025.24263.patches@notabene
OCFS2 can return -ERESTARTSYS from write requests (and possibly
elsewhere) if there is a signal pending.
If nfsd is shutdown (by sending a signal to each thread) while there
is still an IO load from the client, each thread could handle one last
request with a signal pending. This can result in -ERESTARTSYS
which is not understood by nfserrno() and so is reflected back to
the client as nfserr_io aka -EIO. This is wrong.
Instead, interpret ERESTARTSYS to mean "try again later" by returning
nfserr_jukebox. The client will resend and - if the server is
restarted - the write will (hopefully) be successful and everyone will
be happy.
The symptom that I narrowed down to this was:
copy a large file via NFS to an OCFS2 filesystem, and restart
the nfs server during the copy.
The 'cp' might get an -EIO, and the file will be corrupted -
presumably holes in the middle where writes appeared to fail.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
### Diffstat output
./fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c
--- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c 2008-06-19 10:06:36.000000000 +1000
+++ ./fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c 2008-06-19 10:07:58.000000000 +1000
@@ -614,6 +614,7 @@ nfserrno (int errno)
#endif
{ nfserr_stale, -ESTALE },
{ nfserr_jukebox, -ETIMEDOUT },
+ { nfserr_jukebox, -ERESTARTSYS },
{ nfserr_dropit, -EAGAIN },
{ nfserr_dropit, -ENOMEM },
{ nfserr_badname, -ESRCH },
next parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-19 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080619101025.24263.patches@notabene>
2008-06-19 0:11 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2008-06-19 1:09 ` [PATCH - take 2] knfsd: nfsd: Handle ERESTARTSYS from syscalls Jeff Layton
2008-06-19 2:29 ` Neil Brown
2008-06-19 10:38 ` Jeff Layton
2008-06-20 17:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-06-23 0:20 ` Neil Brown
2008-06-23 0:52 ` Jeff Layton
2008-06-23 23:55 ` [PATCH - take 2] knfsd: nfsd: Handle ERESTARTSYS from syscalls. (and possible kthread_stop changes) Neil Brown
2008-06-30 12:35 ` Jeff Layton
2008-06-30 17:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-06-30 18:09 ` Jeff Layton
2008-06-30 19:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-06-20 17:34 ` [PATCH - take 2] knfsd: nfsd: Handle ERESTARTSYS from syscalls J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1080619001109.24338@suse.de \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox