From: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mask ADT: new mask.h file [2/22]
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:11:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1080781885.9787.61.camel@arrakis> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040331165830.3b7e0aec.pj@sgi.com>
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 16:58, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Question:
>
> Matthew, Bill, Andrew, anyone - how should I present the next version of
> this set of 22 give or take patches in this set? Another new set of 22
> lkml posts; one reply or 22 replies to the some post on the existing
> threads; tarballs; web site URL; ... The possibilities are varied.
>
> My inclination would be just as I did it the first time - some 22
> rapid fire separate posts. But I'm game for considering alternatives.
I'd prefer (especially since I'm on the CC line ;) that you send out the
[0/22] mail, and send all the rest of the mails (the actual patches) as
replies to that first mail. That way, at least all of the emails are in
the same thread and can easily be collapsed/expanded. I know when I
checked my mail monday morning and there were all those individual
mails, I thought I'd broken something and people were out for my blood!
;)
-Matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-01 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-29 12:12 [PATCH] mask ADT: new mask.h file [2/22] Paul Jackson
2004-03-30 0:30 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-03-30 0:27 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-30 1:56 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-03-30 0:47 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-30 1:53 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-03-30 2:06 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-30 1:31 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-30 1:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-30 1:27 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-30 6:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-30 8:45 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-30 10:19 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-31 0:16 ` Ray Bryant
2004-03-31 0:14 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-03-30 2:07 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-04-01 0:38 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-04-01 0:58 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-01 1:11 ` Matthew Dobson [this message]
2004-04-01 1:18 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-01 1:27 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-01 1:35 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-05 1:26 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-05 7:05 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-05 7:42 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-05 8:08 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 4:59 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-06 6:06 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 6:23 ` Nick Piggin
2004-04-06 6:34 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 6:49 ` Nick Piggin
2004-04-06 6:59 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 7:08 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 7:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-04-06 7:33 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 6:39 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-06 6:45 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 7:24 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-06 7:34 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 10:40 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-07 0:02 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-07 1:49 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-07 3:55 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 6:55 ` Nick Piggin
2004-04-06 7:34 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 7:02 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-05 7:46 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1080781885.9787.61.camel@arrakis \
--to=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox