From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262454AbUDDQjG (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Apr 2004 12:39:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262471AbUDDQjG (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Apr 2004 12:39:06 -0400 Received: from host4.imagelinkusa.net ([66.246.17.209]:48100 "EHLO host4.imagelinkusa.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262462AbUDDQjE (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Apr 2004 12:39:04 -0400 Subject: [usbfs] 2.6.3+ devmode? From: "Tony A. Lambley" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1081096740.2235.6.camel@bony> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 12:39:00 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host4.imagelinkusa.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - vextech.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, is my brain going yolky? I have perm problems with a scanner after each boot, and have to manually locate the scanner in /proc/bus/usb then chmod it. My fstab has: none /proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults,devmode=0666 0 0 It happens with 2.6.3 through to .5. Am I doing something wrong or is usbfs+devmode a bit under the weather? Or maybe I shouldn't be using usbfs? Is it being depreciated?