* [usbfs] 2.6.3+ devmode?
@ 2004-04-04 16:39 Tony A. Lambley
2004-04-05 16:19 ` Randy.Dunlap
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tony A. Lambley @ 2004-04-04 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi, is my brain going yolky? I have perm problems with a scanner after
each boot, and have to manually locate the scanner in /proc/bus/usb then
chmod it.
My fstab has:
none /proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults,devmode=0666 0 0
It happens with 2.6.3 through to .5. Am I doing something wrong or is
usbfs+devmode a bit under the weather?
Or maybe I shouldn't be using usbfs? Is it being depreciated?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [usbfs] 2.6.3+ devmode?
2004-04-04 16:39 [usbfs] 2.6.3+ devmode? Tony A. Lambley
@ 2004-04-05 16:19 ` Randy.Dunlap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Randy.Dunlap @ 2004-04-05 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony A. Lambley; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 12:39:00 -0400 Tony A. Lambley wrote:
| Hi, is my brain going yolky? I have perm problems with a scanner after
| each boot, and have to manually locate the scanner in /proc/bus/usb then
| chmod it.
|
| My fstab has:
|
| none /proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults,devmode=0666 0 0
|
| It happens with 2.6.3 through to .5. Am I doing something wrong or is
| usbfs+devmode a bit under the weather?
I think that's related to kernel bug #1418:
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1418
| Or maybe I shouldn't be using usbfs? Is it being depreciated?
No, it's not being deprecated.
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-05 16:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-04 16:39 [usbfs] 2.6.3+ devmode? Tony A. Lambley
2004-04-05 16:19 ` Randy.Dunlap
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox