From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] rmap: parisc __flush_dcache_page
Date: 08 Apr 2004 13:28:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1081448897.2105.465.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040408181838.GN31667@dualathlon.random>
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 13:18, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> it enterely depends on the workload. On a desktop machine there may be
> only some hundred entries in those lists at maximum with glibc being the
> biggest offender:
>
> cat /proc/*/maps | grep libc.so.6 | wc -l
>
> with shared memory on some server there can be easily several thousand
> entries for some inode even on 64bit, but a timeslice was probably
> exaggerated (the timeslice was for the walking of the ptes in each
> mapping too, I don't think you need to look at every pte).
So you're worried about our code? OK, if you look, you'll see we only
have to flush one address in the mmap_shared list, (which is usually the
long list).
I'd constructed it on the predicate that flushing a non-current space is
more expensive than finding a current one, but I can alter it to flush
the first vma it comes to with a present translation.
The mmap list is usually empty. We only excite that case for multiple
private mappings of a file which for some reason gets updated.
I'd be very surprised if flush_dcache_page executes more than a few
hundred instructions all told...that's certainly nowhere close to a
timeslice.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-08 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-08 13:41 rmap: parisc __flush_dcache_page Hugh Dickins
2004-04-08 13:52 ` [parisc-linux] " James Bottomley
2004-04-08 14:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-08 14:40 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 15:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 15:28 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 15:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 15:47 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 16:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 16:29 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 17:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 17:43 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 17:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 18:07 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 18:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 18:28 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2004-04-08 18:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 18:49 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 19:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-10 1:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-04-08 15:35 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-08 16:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1081448897.2105.465.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox