From: Ryan Geoffrey Bourgeois <rgb005@latech.edu>
To: Simon Koch <koch0121@umn.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: poor sata performance on 2.6 - Promise SX4
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:11:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1082074290.407f24b21997c@webmail.LaTech.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <407F1C07.6050104@umn.edu>
>
> What kernel/driver are you using for the S150 SX4? I couldn't ever get
> better than 13MB/sec from it in 2.6. Of course, the last I tried was
> 2.6.3. I could get 55MB/sec using 2.4 and Promise's partial source
> driver, but since my onboard SATA controller works fine in 2.6 I'm just
> using that meanwhile.
>
> Thanks,
> Simon
>
The performance isn't that great at the moment. Poor driver support for the SX4
right now, as it's kinda the odd card in the lot. The way it handles its
hardware RAID is kinda unique from what I've heard. I'm using the sata_promise
driver on the 2.6.5 kernel. In the works is supposed to be a separate driver
specifically for the SX4, which is the main reason I joined the linux-ide list
in the first place. Due to the SX4's unique approach to hardware RAID5, there
is not yet a driver that supports RAID5 arrays on the controller, and so each
drive can only be accessed separately. Thus I'm using Linux's software RAID5
for my three Western Digital 120gb drives (WD1200JD I think). I got about
25mb/s read time on a drive connected to the controller. It really is below
par, but it's getting the job done until we get a good driver.
-Ryan
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-16 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-14 22:36 poor sata performance on 2.6 Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 3:54 ` Ryan Geoffrey Bourgeois
2004-04-15 10:55 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 12:02 ` Justin Cormack
2004-04-15 13:34 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 14:00 ` Justin Cormack
2004-04-15 14:26 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 14:33 ` Justin Cormack
2004-04-15 14:48 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 14:52 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-04-15 17:30 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-04-16 1:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-16 14:48 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-04-16 16:59 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-16 17:46 ` cira
2004-04-20 12:41 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-04-15 15:51 ` Ryan Geoffrey Bourgeois
2004-04-15 23:34 ` Simon Koch
2004-04-16 0:11 ` Ryan Geoffrey Bourgeois [this message]
2004-04-16 1:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-19 16:45 ` Henrik Gustafsson
2004-04-19 16:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-15 7:12 ` Lenar Lõhmus
2004-04-15 10:40 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 12:37 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-04-15 12:57 ` Lenar Lõhmus
2004-04-15 16:54 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-04-15 13:05 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 19:50 ` Pavel Machek
2004-04-15 21:13 ` Konstantin Sobolev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1082074290.407f24b21997c@webmail.LaTech.edu \
--to=rgb005@latech.edu \
--cc=koch0121@umn.edu \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox