From: Jord Tanner <jord@indygecko.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: brad_mssw@gentoo.org, Atulm@lsil.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.0] megaraid 64bit fix/cleanup (AMD64)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 06:56:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1082123798.11604.69.camel@gecko> (raw)
On Tue Dec 30 2003 - 16:11:40 EST Brad House wrote:
Ok, I just ported the 2.00.9 driver to 2.6.0.
It still has these warnings during compilation as I did not
attempt to apply my 64bit fixes from before as I've been told
they are just plain wrong :/
But, I suppose this should work fine in 32bit mode, I would
greatly appreciate any help in porting it for 64bit platforms.
The patch can be downloaded here :
http://dev.gentoo.org/~brad_mssw/kernel_patches/megaraid/megaraid-v2.00.9-linux2.6.patch
And only applies to the source from ftp.lsil.com, it's not a
kernel-patch
per-se, but copying the result over to the drivers/scsi will
compile inplace
of the current versions.
Please CC me on any replies!
-Brad House <brad_mssw@xxxxxxxxxx>
This thread has been inactive for a while, but I've not found anything
more relevant to my situation.
I'm running 2.6.3-gentoo (and 2.6.5-gentoo) with a LSILogic SATA
Megaraid 150-6 raid controller on a dual Opteron system. The entire
system is compiled in 64bit. We are seeing random database corruption
when access very large Postgres tables (more than 10 million rows).
Other than that, the system runs beautifully.
As far as I can tell, no amd64 specific patches have been applied to the
megaraid driver in 2.6.3 (version 2.00.3). Brad House has posted a 2.6
patch for megaraid 2.00.9, but his previous amd64 patches were removed.
LSI tech support has suggested I upgrade to 2.00.9, but the LSI source
is for 2.4.
So my questions are:
- Could the 2.00.3 driver be responsible for random data
corruption when running on 2.6.3 in 64bit?
- Is it safe to run Brad House's 2.6 megaraid 2.00.9 patches in
64 bit mode on amd64?
- Are there any patches for megaraid 2.00.9 (or higher, I see
2.00.10-3 has just been released) that combine patches for 2.6
and amd64?
TIA,
--
Jord Tanner <jord@indygecko.com>
next reply other threads:[~2004-04-16 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-16 13:56 Jord Tanner [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-16 19:24 [PATCH 2.6.0] megaraid 64bit fix/cleanup (AMD64) Mukker, Atul
2004-04-16 16:35 Mukker, Atul
2004-04-16 19:21 ` Jord Tanner
[not found] ` <A1E28594-9478-11D8-B5AA-000A95CD704C@wagland.net>
2004-04-22 18:22 ` Jord Tanner
2004-04-22 18:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] <18kst-5Av-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-12-30 5:26 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-01 14:08 ` Brad House
2003-12-30 5:10 Brad House
2003-12-30 5:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-30 6:26 ` Brad House
2003-12-30 6:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-30 19:43 ` Samuel Flory
2003-12-30 19:49 ` Brad House
2003-12-30 19:54 ` Samuel Flory
2003-12-30 21:09 ` Brad House
2003-12-30 23:11 ` Matt Domsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1082123798.11604.69.camel@gecko \
--to=jord@indygecko.com \
--cc=Atulm@lsil.com \
--cc=brad_mssw@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox