From: Mary Edie Meredith <maryedie@osdl.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: DBT3-pgsql large performance improvement 2.6.6-rc1
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:51:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1082134307.16437.461.camel@localhost> (raw)
Performance in DBT-3 (using PostgreSQL) has vastly
improved for _both in the "power" portion (single
process/query) and in the "throughput" portion of
the test (when the test is running multiple processes)
on our 4-way(4GB) and 8-way(8GB) STP systems as
compared 2.6.5 kernel results.
Using the default DBT-3 options (ie using LVM, ext2,
PostgreSQL version 7.4.1)
Note: Bigger numbers are better.
Kernel....Runid..CPUs.Power..%incP.Thruput %incT
2.6.5 291308 4 97.08 base 120.46 base
2.6.6-rc1 291876 4 146.11 50.5% 222.94 85.1%
Kernel....Runid..CPUs.Power..%incP..Thruput %incT
2.6.5 291346 8 101.08 base 138.95 base
2.6.6-rc1 291915 8 151.69 50.1% 273.69 97.0%
So the improvement is between 50% and 97%!
Profile 2.6.5 8way throughput phase:
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/291346/profile/after_throughput_test_1-tick.sort
Profile 2.6.6-r1 8way throughput phase:
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/291915/profile/after_throughput_test_1-tick.sort
What I notice is that radix_tree_lookup is in
the top 20 in the 2.6.5 profile, but not in
2.6.6-rc1. Could theradix tree changes be
responsible for this?
DBT-3 is a read mostly DSS workload and the throughput
phase is where we run multiple query streams (as
many as we have CPUs). In this workload, the database
is stored on a file system, but it is small relative
to the amount of memory (4GB and 8GB). It almost
completely caches in page cache early on. So there
is some physical IO in the first few minutes, but very
little to none in the remainder.
--
Mary Edie Meredith
maryedie@osdl.org
503-626-2455 x42
Open Source Development Labs
next reply other threads:[~2004-04-16 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-16 16:51 Mary Edie Meredith [this message]
2004-04-16 21:49 ` DBT3-pgsql large performance improvement 2.6.6-rc1 Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-19 23:14 Mary Edie Meredith
2004-04-29 23:50 ` Mary Edie Meredith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1082134307.16437.461.camel@localhost \
--to=maryedie@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox