public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Subject: Re: sched_domains and Stream benchmark
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 15:30:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1083018633.3070.8.camel@farah> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3r7uitr1r.fsf@averell.firstfloor.org>

On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 11:58, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> writes:
> 
> > Andi,
> >
> > You have mentioned the stream benchmark when reporting on the
> > performance of the Opteron NUMA sched-domains scheduler.  I am trying to
> > reproduce your results and am struggling with the benchmark.  Can you
> > rpovide the details of the tests you ran.  Namely your compiler
> > settings, compile command line, and your value of N.  Also I didn't see
> > how to specify the number of threads to run, how did you specify that? 
> > I have a 4 way 1.4 GHz 1MB cache opteron machine with 7 GB of RAM.
> 
> I didn't actually compile them myself; someone sent me executables
> compiled with the PGI compiler.  Maybe your compiler has a different
> runtime and behaves differently? 
> 
> You can find them and my test script that tests everything in 
> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/ak/bench/stream.tar.gz

Thanks Andi,

I noticed your binary ran with N=2000000 which is only sufficient for a
2 proc 1 MB cache opteron box according to the documentation on the
stream faq.  I also noticed wide variation in results (25% or so) when
running with 4 threads on a 4 proc opteron on linux-2.6.5-mm5.  Can you
provide me with the specs of the system you ran your tests on?

Thanks,

Darren


  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-26 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1N7xQ-7fh-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-04-20 18:58 ` sched_domains and Stream benchmark Andi Kleen
2004-04-26 22:30   ` Darren Hart [this message]
2004-04-27  2:33     ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-27  2:44       ` Nick Piggin
2004-04-27  2:48         ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-27  2:54           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-27 16:47       ` Darren Hart
2004-04-27 21:03         ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-28  9:47     ` Zoltan Menyhart
2004-04-28 17:20       ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-20 17:43 Darren Hart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1083018633.3070.8.camel@farah \
    --to=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox