From: Colin Paton <colin.paton@etvinteractive.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Possible permissions bug on NFSv3 kernel client
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:02:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1083236543.4541.293.camel@colinp> (raw)
Hi,
I have found what I think might be a bug with the kernel NFS v3 client
code. It is however more likely that I am doing something wrong -
perhaps someone might verify my attempted fix!
Google suggests that other people might be having the same problem - but
I couldn't find a fix so had a go myself.
I am trying to export a filesystem as read-only from a server. On my
client machine I boot into an initial filesystem, mount the 'real' root
filesystem over NFS, then pivot_root to it.
If I mount the root filesystem as NFSv2 (using mount -o nfsvers=2) then
everything works correctly. If I mount as NFSv3 then I run into problems
when trying to write to block/character device files.
Both the client and the server are using kernel 2.4.25, with knfsd on
the server. I case it matters, I am using busybox 1.00-pre8 mount, but
the same thing happens with mount version 2.11n on a Debian system.
Essentially, it does not appear to be possible to write to device files
which are mounted on a read-only NFSv3 filesystem. The problem only
occurs with NFS v3 - Mounting the filesystem as NFSv2 (using mount -o
nfsvers=2) is fine.
To reproduce:
- On a server machine create a character device file on a read-only NFS
exported directory (called 'tty3' in this example)
- Mount the NFS volume on a client machine.
- From the client machine, run 'cat > /mnt/tty3'
The kernel returns EACCES when trying to open the 'tty3' device.
The 'cat > /mnt/tty3' command works properly if the directory is
exported read-write.
Reading from the device file (cat < /mnt/tty3) is fine in all cases.
Doing a trace with ethereal shows that an NFS 'access' RPC is sent to
the server, with the access bitmask set to 'allow MODIFY+EXTEND'. The
server returns that these are not allowed, as the filesystem is mounted
read-only. This causes the EACCES error.
I modified the client kernel code as follows, to make the NFS client
behave differently:
In file: fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c modify nfs3_proc_access(). This calls the
access RPC on the server. I added the following to the code:
if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode) || S_ISCHR(inode->i_mode))
{
// Leave arg.access untouched.
}
...so that the the MODIFY and EXTEND bits aren't set when writing to a
block or character device.
This fix works, yet I believe it might introduce a security problem. I
am not sure where permissions should be properly checked.
The access RPC appears specific to NFS v3. I am not sure how NFS v2 does
permissions checking.
In addition, I am not 100% sure if the problem is at the client end or
the server end - have I just masked the problem rather than actually
fixing it?
Alternatively, of course, there may be some specific reason why NFSv3 is
not recommended for root filesystems - in which case it might be better
to fall back to NFSv2.
Thanks,
Colin
next reply other threads:[~2004-04-29 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-29 11:02 Colin Paton [this message]
2004-04-29 17:39 ` Possible permissions bug on NFSv3 kernel client Trond Myklebust
[not found] <1QhAA-5zc-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1QnPD-2pg-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-04-29 20:49 ` Pascal Schmidt
2004-04-29 21:17 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] <1QqNJ-4QH-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1QqNJ-4QH-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1QqNJ-4QH-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1Qrhg-5hH-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-04-30 20:17 ` Pascal Schmidt
2004-04-30 20:39 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-05-01 10:54 ` Pascal Schmidt
2004-05-04 9:55 ` Colin Paton
2004-05-04 13:52 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1083236543.4541.293.camel@colinp \
--to=colin.paton@etvinteractive.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox