From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264631AbUEDVOx (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2004 17:14:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264625AbUEDVOx (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2004 17:14:53 -0400 Received: from legolas.restena.lu ([158.64.1.34]:31189 "EHLO smtp.restena.lu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264631AbUEDVO2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2004 17:14:28 -0400 Subject: RE: IO-APIC on nforce2 [PATCH] + [PATCH] for nmi_debug=1 + [PATCH] for idle=C1halt, 2.6.5 From: Craig Bradney To: Jesse Allen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20040504203840.GA2102@tesore.local> References: <20040504203840.GA2102@tesore.local> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-5+2TtRLZbz5+vSLtxVFW" Message-Id: <1083705265.696.5.camel@amilo.bradney.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 23:14:25 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-5+2TtRLZbz5+vSLtxVFW Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 22:38, Jesse Allen wrote: > Allen Martin wrote: > > This will require changing the value for register at bus:0 dev:0 func:0 > > offset 6c. > > > > Chip Current Value New Value > > C17 1F0FFF01 1F01FF01 > > C18D 9F0FFF01 9F01FF01 > > > > Northbridge chip version may be determined by reading the PCI revision > > ID (offset 8) of the host bridge at bus:0 dev:0 func:0. C1 or greater > > is C18D. >=20 > I believe I have confirmed that the Shuttle AN35N BIOS indeed has this fi= x as > of Dec 5th 03 version. >=20 > lspci -xxx -vvv > 00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP (different version?)=20 > (rev c1) > ... > 60: 08 00 01 20 20 00 88 80 10 00 00 00 01 ff 01 9f I can confirm on my Asus A7N8X Deluxe v2.0 with BIOS 1007 (the latest), that its reporting 60: 08 00 01 20 20 00 88 80 10 00 00 00 01 ff 0f 9f So, it looks like it needs the new value as per the note. I haven't applied that patch that was posted yesterday, am awaiting more reaction from Len, Ross and all. Craig --=-5+2TtRLZbz5+vSLtxVFW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAmAewi+pIEYrr7mQRAjn7AJ9aziqlMe9mu7cRzmJ2aLy12R8FXACggEcm JaNC2eSOUnKHGSNhL51KR5w= =oal1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-5+2TtRLZbz5+vSLtxVFW--