Re: [patch] really-ptrace-single-step

Fabiano Ramos
2004-05-11T18:37:32Z

On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 14:38, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2004, Fabiano Ramos wrote:
>
> > It would not work against 2.6.5, since
> >
> > do_syscall_trace()
> >
> > makes the check
> >
> > if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE))
> > return;
> >
> > Simply removing it would do?
>
> No no. You need to OR it with the single-step. Try:
>
> if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE) &&
> !test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
> return;
>
>
> - Davide

Still not working. :(
Correct me if I am wrong: is TIF_SINGLESTEP asserted whenever a process
is being singlestepped? I do not see where it is done.

>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/