From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.12?
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 12:45:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1084620000.1118346308@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <563780000.1118292280@[10.10.2.4]>
> Now what's REALLY, REALLY wierd is that this fixes my hang problem
> whilst trying to run kernbench:
>
> http://mbligh.org/abat/no_hang
>
> which is just reverting:
>
> x86_64-use-a-common-function-to-find-code-segment-bases-fix.patch
>
> But the patch is tiny, and it makes NO sense at all for this to fix
> anything. All it does is:
Strangely, -git3 works, which has the boot fix applied, but not the
hang fix bit. Something odd is afoot.
> diff -purN -X /home/mbligh/.diff.exclude 2.6.12-rc2-mm2/include/asm-x86_64/ptrace.h 2.6.12-rc2-mm2-no_hang/include/asm-x86_64/ptrace.h
> --- 2.6.12-rc2-mm2/include/asm-x86_64/ptrace.h 2005-04-08 23:41:41.000000000 -0700
> +++ 2.6.12-rc2-mm2-no_hang/include/asm-x86_64/ptrace.h 2005-06-08 16:25:01.000000000 -0700
> @@ -86,8 +86,6 @@ struct pt_regs {
> extern unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs);
> void signal_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, void __user *frame, char *where);
>
> -struct task_struct;
> -
> extern unsigned long
> convert_rip_to_linear(struct task_struct *child, struct pt_regs *regs);
>
>
> How the hell can that possibly fix it? Boggle. But it does. I checked.
> I ran a whole damned sequence of patches from your tree against the box,
> then extracted the one where the failover started and retested it with
> just that and the no_hole one. There's even a little green box to
> prove it about 4 down on the left here:
>
> http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mbligh/abat/regression_matrix.html
>
> My brain is now a small piece of silly-putty smushed against the far
> wall of my study. Anything you can do to help me scrape up the remains
> would be splendid. I can only speculate it's some wierd side-effect,
> because I have no other explaination at all.
>
> Humpf.
>
> M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-09 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-03 22:24 2.6.12? Jeff Garzik
2005-06-03 23:37 ` 2.6.12? Francois Romieu
2005-06-04 8:36 ` 2.6.12? Jeff Garzik
2005-06-04 11:33 ` 2.6.12? Francois Romieu
2005-06-04 20:59 ` 2.6.12? Jeff Garzik
2005-06-03 23:38 ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-03 23:55 ` 2.6.12? Jeff Garzik
2005-06-04 0:05 ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-06 10:56 ` 2.6.12? Takashi Iwai
2005-06-04 0:01 ` 2.6.12? Wakko Warner
2005-06-04 0:51 ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-04 0:03 ` 2.6.12? Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-04 1:19 ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-04 0:05 ` 2.6.12? Brice Goglin
2005-06-04 1:21 ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-07 14:43 ` 2.6.12? Brice Goglin
2005-06-07 15:53 ` 2.6.12? Sylvain Meyer
2005-06-08 8:02 ` 2.6.12? Brice Goglin
2005-06-04 0:34 ` 2.6.12? Dave Jones
2005-06-04 1:50 ` 2.6.12? Dmitry Torokhov
2005-06-04 8:15 ` 2.6.12? Russell King
2005-06-04 9:25 ` 2.6.12? Johannes Stezenbach
2005-06-04 12:25 ` 2.6.12? Michael Krufky
2005-06-04 14:23 ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-04 14:35 ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-04 15:24 ` 2.6.12? Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-06-04 22:11 ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-05 15:02 ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-07 18:16 ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-07 19:24 ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-08 12:56 ` 2.6.12? Andi Kleen
2005-06-08 19:47 ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-08 23:04 ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-09 4:44 ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-09 19:45 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2005-06-09 13:41 ` 2.6.12? Andi Kleen
2005-06-06 22:06 ` 2.6.12? Adam Belay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1084620000.1118346308@flay \
--to=mbligh@mbligh.org \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox