From: Henrik Persson <nix@syndicalist.net>
To: "Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <Mario.Holbe@RZ.TU-Ilmenau.DE>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian <sebastian@expires0604.datenknoten.de>,
Bruce Allen <ballen@gravity.phys.uwm.edu>
Subject: Re: Strange DMA-errors and system hang with Promise 20268
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 12:41:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1085913685.3431.9.camel@vega> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040529144256.GA399@darkside.22.kls.lan>
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 16:42, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 02:05:46AM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> > Mar 4 01:01:06 darkside kernel: hde: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x21
>
> hmmm, it seems I solved the issue in my case.
>
> I did just connect the two disks on the Promise to a second separate
> power supply and everything works rock-stable and survives all things
> that went wrong before (parallel fsck, parallel hdparm -t as well as
> 'normal operation' over days).
> Things remain stable even with the WDC disk connected back to the
> Promise, which was heavy unstable before.
>
> Moreover, when I connect the disks back to the machines internal power
> supply, the problems arise again - immediately.
>
> IMHO, this does also explain, why the problems happen while heavy I/O
> (parallel over all disks) and/or while S.M.A.R.T selftests are running
> (also: parallel over all disks).
>
> Well, I thought, a 300W power supply would be enough for 1GHz P-III
> and 4 disks. And it definitely was enough for a long time.
>
> Most likely, the power supply just aged and its capacity decreased.
>
> Perhaps, the disks consume more power with newer kernels, but while
> crawling the lkm archives I found similar reports also for 2.4.19.
>
> I have no idea, why always the disks connected to the Promise
> controller did fail. Perhaps, the Promise is more sensitive regarding
> signal quality on the IDE wire.
>
> I have no idea, why my WDC disk failed when connected to the Promise,
> while others did work far more stable. Perhaps, the WDC disks signal
> quality under low-power is more bad than the one of other disks.
>
> I have no idea, why the WDC disk did work well when it was connected
> to the onboard controller. Perhaps, the lower signal quality of the
> WDC (if so) and the sensitivity of the Promise (if so) added together
> was too much at all.
>
>
> Henrik, Sebastian: if you still have problems, this is probably
> something to test for you.
Well. I don't have those problems anymore but..I have a question..
Should the box freeze just because there is some powerfailures? :/
--
Henrik Persson <nix@syndicalist.net>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-30 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-06 19:47 Strange DMA-errors and system hang with Promise 20268 Henrik Persson
2004-03-06 19:55 ` Henrik Persson
2004-03-07 1:05 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2004-03-08 13:30 ` Henrik Persson
2004-03-10 11:50 ` Bruce Allen
2004-03-10 12:36 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2004-03-10 15:00 ` Henrik Persson
2004-03-11 9:36 ` Bruce Allen
2004-03-11 14:31 ` Henrik Persson
2004-03-10 15:41 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2004-03-11 9:25 ` Bruce Allen
2004-05-19 17:20 ` Sebastian
2004-05-19 17:28 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2004-05-19 18:12 ` Sebastian
[not found] ` <1648.128.150.143.219.1084992082.squirrel@webmail.seven4sky.com>
2004-05-19 20:12 ` Strange DMA-errors... (was: ...and system hang with Promise 20268) Sebastian
2004-05-19 23:47 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2004-05-20 9:23 ` Strange DMA-errors and system hang with Promise 20268 Bruce Allen
2004-05-20 10:35 ` Strange DMA-errors and system hang with SMART (was: ...and system hang with Promise 20268) Sebastian
2004-05-23 12:46 ` Bruce Allen
2004-06-02 19:00 ` Sebastian
2004-06-03 15:06 ` Bruce Allen
2004-05-29 14:42 ` Strange DMA-errors and system hang with Promise 20268 Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2004-05-29 22:51 ` Gene Heskett
2004-05-30 10:41 ` Henrik Persson [this message]
2004-06-04 20:09 ` Bruce Allen
[not found] ` <200405052339.i45NdXsx003369@darkside.22.kls.lan>
[not found] ` <1083849053.6994.10.camel@vega>
2004-05-06 14:22 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1085913685.3431.9.camel@vega \
--to=nix@syndicalist.net \
--cc=Mario.Holbe@RZ.TU-Ilmenau.DE \
--cc=ballen@gravity.phys.uwm.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian@expires0604.datenknoten.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox