public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@microgate.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.6 synclinkmp.c
Date: 01 Jun 2004 16:25:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1086125129.2047.21.camel@deimos.microgate.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040601215710.F31301@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 15:57, Russell King wrote:
> If pci_register_driver fails, the driver is not, repeat not left
> registered.  Therefore it must not be unregistered after failure
> to register.

You are right. The specific problem I was trying to
fix is when no hardware is detected. I looked at other
PCI drivers (char/epca.c and net/eepro100.c) and which call
pci_unregister_driver if pci_register_driver returns <= 0
and indicates that pci_register_device returns the number
of pci devices detected. I now see that the two drivers I
looked at are broken. (bad luck that)

After looking at the source for pci_register_device(),
if no devices are detected, then it still returns 1.

I will rework the patches against synclink.c/synclinkmp.c
to only call pci_unregister_device() if init fails
(such as when no devices are detected)
*and* the call to pci_register_device() succeeds.

--
Paul Fulghum
paulkf@microgate.com



  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-01 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-27 17:45 Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:122 Jurjen Oskam
2004-05-27 18:19 ` Jurjen Oskam
2004-05-27 20:41 ` Paul Fulghum
2004-05-28 18:42 ` [PATCH][RFC] 2.6.6 tty_io.c hangup locking Paul Fulghum
2004-05-28 20:11   ` Jurjen Oskam
2004-05-28 20:33     ` Paul Fulghum
2004-05-28 23:06   ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-29 17:45     ` Paul Fulghum
2004-06-01 20:51     ` [PATCH] 2.6.6 synclinkmp.c Paul Fulghum
2004-06-01 20:57       ` Russell King
2004-06-01 21:25         ` Paul Fulghum [this message]
2004-06-02 21:22           ` Russell King
2004-06-02 22:04             ` Paul Fulghum
2004-06-02 14:13         ` Paul Fulghum
2004-06-01 20:51     ` [PATCH] 2.6.6 synclink.c Paul Fulghum
2004-06-02 14:15       ` Paul Fulghum
2004-06-01 20:53     ` [PATCH] 2.6.6 synclink_cs.c Paul Fulghum
2004-06-01 21:00       ` Russell King
2004-06-01 23:04         ` Paul Fulghum
2004-06-13  9:05   ` [PATCH][RFC] 2.6.6 tty_io.c hangup locking Jurjen Oskam
2004-06-13 13:29     ` Paul Fulghum
2004-06-13 14:24       ` Jurjen Oskam
2004-06-13 14:39         ` Paul Fulghum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1086125129.2047.21.camel@deimos.microgate.com \
    --to=paulkf@microgate.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox