Re: [STACK] >3k call path in reiserfs

Hans Reiser
2004-06-09T23:43:38Z

Chris Mason wrote:

>On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 14:09, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
>
>>Unless it is really necessary, or a small code change, I would prefer to
>>spend our cycles worrying about this in reiser4, because code changes in
>>V3 are to be avoided if possible.
>>
>>I am open to arguments that it is really necessary.
>>
>>
>
>It's pretty important, especially when you toss NFS into the call path
>the stack usage can go higher. The switch to kmalloc will be relatively
>small and by now we're good at testing for schedule bugs.
>
>-chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
Performance impact of kmalloc?