From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265947AbUF2X60 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:58:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266143AbUF2X60 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:58:26 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.103]:49907 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265947AbUF2X6Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:58:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH][PPC64] lparcfg seq_file update From: Dave Hansen To: will schmidt Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Anton Blanchard , Paul Mackerras In-Reply-To: <40E1F6FC.3030405@vnet.ibm.com> References: <40E1F6FC.3030405@vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1088553490.26704.43.camel@nighthawk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:58:11 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 16:10, will schmidt wrote: > Hi All, > This patch includes updates and cleanup for the PPC64 proc/lparcfg > interface. I think your mailer whitespace-munged the patch. Also, why do you need this information: + seq_printf(m, "partition_active_processors=%d\n", + (int) lparcfg_count_active_processors()); Doesn't that duplicate information already exported in /proc/cpuinfo and /sys/devices/system/cpu? -- Dave