From: Redeeman <lkml@metanurb.dk>
To: LKML Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 15:25:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1089120330.10626.8.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407051754.38690.lkml@lpbproductions.com>
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 17:54 -0700, Matt Heler wrote:
> Ok first take benchmarks ( use wget ), and secondly results from the internet
> vary day by day , hour to hour , minute by minute. Don't expect all sites on
> the internet to be the same speed, or even stay the same speed for that
> matter. For more accurate benchmark results setup a personal server on your
> own private network and benchmark http trasnfers using different kernels.
i am aware of this, however, what i use to benchmark is kernel.org, as i
can see they have alot bandwith free.
if i use kernel.org http i get 50kb/s, if i use ftp, i can easily fetch
with 200kb/s
also, the gnu ftp, where i took gcc3.4.1, it gave me 200kb/s
>
> Matt H.
>
>
>
> On Monday 05 July 2004 4:38 pm, Redeeman wrote:
> > hey, i have had a breakthrough in the investigation...
> > it turns out that some sites does not load.. but you know all about
> > that, and a "fix" with sysctl fixes some of it.
> >
> > networking was generally slow - or not!
> > it seems that its only HTTP transfers going insanely slow. which also
> > probably is those ipv4 issues, so now we just need to figure out what
> > changed, and what we need to change to fix it, so that we again can get
> > all sites loading, and HTTP protocol fully functionel again.
> >
> > hope someone has some ideas.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-06 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-05 23:38 quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix Redeeman
2004-07-06 0:54 ` Matt Heler
2004-07-06 13:25 ` Redeeman [this message]
2004-07-06 13:53 ` Erik Mouw
2004-07-06 15:49 ` Redeeman
2004-07-06 18:46 ` Matt Heler
2004-07-06 20:08 ` John Richard Moser
2004-07-06 20:20 ` John Richard Moser
2004-07-06 19:30 ` Horst von Brand
2004-07-07 0:42 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 1:12 ` Matt Heler
2004-07-07 4:46 ` qubes
2004-07-07 5:46 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 6:31 ` bert hubert
2004-07-07 6:37 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 8:19 ` bert hubert
2004-07-07 8:29 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 7:45 ` Redeeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1089120330.10626.8.camel@localhost \
--to=lkml@metanurb.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox