From: Redeeman <lkml@metanurb.dk>
To: Erik Mouw <erik@harddisk-recovery.com>
Cc: LKML Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:49:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1089128977.10626.11.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040706135303.GG20237@harddisk-recovery.com>
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 15:53 +0200, Erik Mouw wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Redeeman wrote:
> > i am aware of this, however, what i use to benchmark is kernel.org, as i
> > can see they have alot bandwith free.
> > if i use kernel.org http i get 50kb/s, if i use ftp, i can easily fetch
> > with 200kb/s
>
> That could be easily explained by the fact that the www.kernel.org ftp
> and http services are handled by different programs (vsftpd vs.
> Apache).
yeah it could.. however it isnt. because 2.6.5 can easily take 200kb/s
from kernel.org http, and it sound strange too, that with 2.6.7 ALL http
adresses only give 50kb/s, and with 2.6.5 it gives 200 :>
>
>
> Erik
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-06 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-05 23:38 quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix Redeeman
2004-07-06 0:54 ` Matt Heler
2004-07-06 13:25 ` Redeeman
2004-07-06 13:53 ` Erik Mouw
2004-07-06 15:49 ` Redeeman [this message]
2004-07-06 18:46 ` Matt Heler
2004-07-06 20:08 ` John Richard Moser
2004-07-06 20:20 ` John Richard Moser
2004-07-06 19:30 ` Horst von Brand
2004-07-07 0:42 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 1:12 ` Matt Heler
2004-07-07 4:46 ` qubes
2004-07-07 5:46 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 6:31 ` bert hubert
2004-07-07 6:37 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 8:19 ` bert hubert
2004-07-07 8:29 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 7:45 ` Redeeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1089128977.10626.11.camel@localhost \
--to=lkml@metanurb.dk \
--cc=erik@harddisk-recovery.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox