From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263972AbUGFPtk (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:49:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264048AbUGFPtk (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:49:40 -0400 Received: from pfepc.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.237]:30552 "EHLO pfepc.post.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263972AbUGFPti (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:49:38 -0400 Subject: Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix From: Redeeman To: Erik Mouw Cc: LKML Mailinglist In-Reply-To: <20040706135303.GG20237@harddisk-recovery.com> References: <1089070720.14870.6.camel@localhost> <200407051754.38690.lkml@lpbproductions.com> <1089120330.10626.8.camel@localhost> <20040706135303.GG20237@harddisk-recovery.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:49:37 +0200 Message-Id: <1089128977.10626.11.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 15:53 +0200, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Redeeman wrote: > > i am aware of this, however, what i use to benchmark is kernel.org, as i > > can see they have alot bandwith free. > > if i use kernel.org http i get 50kb/s, if i use ftp, i can easily fetch > > with 200kb/s > > That could be easily explained by the fact that the www.kernel.org ftp > and http services are handled by different programs (vsftpd vs. > Apache). yeah it could.. however it isnt. because 2.6.5 can easily take 200kb/s from kernel.org http, and it sound strange too, that with 2.6.7 ALL http adresses only give 50kb/s, and with 2.6.5 it gives 200 :> > > > Erik >