From: Redeeman <lkml@metanurb.dk>
To: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
Cc: LKML Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
Subject: Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:45:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1089186337.12074.1.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040707063100.GA18382@outpost.ds9a.nl>
okay, no i tested using a hardware router as gateway and it works fine,
but this could aswell be because the hardware router is having the same
stuff as default has linux 2.6.5, i dont know,
what more shall i test? :)
On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 08:31 +0200, bert hubert wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 07:46:26AM +0200, Redeeman wrote:
> > this must be some misunderstanding, i do not want to complain, and i
> > dont hope people get that impression, i am trying to do feedback, so
> > that issues can be fixed.
>
> Redeeman - your firewall is broken, or somebody's firewall.
>
> Look at /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_default_win_scale , if it currently contains
> 7, do:
>
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_default_win_scale
>
> and retry.
>
> > downloads with 200kb/s from http://kernel.org, and 2.6.7 only 50kb/s,
> > this should be able to prove its some issues with 2.6.7, but thats just
> > my opinion
>
> Things can be more complicated than they appear. Currently all evidence for
> these changes points to firewalls messing with TCP options, TCP options
> which used to have more default versions in older kernels.
>
> Regards,
>
> bert
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-07 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-05 23:38 quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix Redeeman
2004-07-06 0:54 ` Matt Heler
2004-07-06 13:25 ` Redeeman
2004-07-06 13:53 ` Erik Mouw
2004-07-06 15:49 ` Redeeman
2004-07-06 18:46 ` Matt Heler
2004-07-06 20:08 ` John Richard Moser
2004-07-06 20:20 ` John Richard Moser
2004-07-06 19:30 ` Horst von Brand
2004-07-07 0:42 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 1:12 ` Matt Heler
2004-07-07 4:46 ` qubes
2004-07-07 5:46 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 6:31 ` bert hubert
2004-07-07 6:37 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 8:19 ` bert hubert
2004-07-07 8:29 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 7:45 ` Redeeman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1089186337.12074.1.camel@localhost \
--to=lkml@metanurb.dk \
--cc=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox