From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [FC1], 2.6.8-rc2 kernel, new motherboard problems
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 02:06:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1090649207.1006.12.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407240158.56434.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
On Sat, 2004-07-24 at 01:58, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 23 July 2004 20:55, Lee Revell wrote:
> >On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 14:49, Nuno Monteiro wrote:
> >> On 2004.07.22 13:49, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> > 00:04.0 Ethernet controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Ethernet
> >> > Controller (rev a1)
> >> > Subsystem: Biostar Microtech Int'l Corp: Unknown device
> >> > 2301
> >> >
> >> > However, this, nor the xconfig helps, still don't indicate which
> >> > driver I should be using, or where to get it if its not in the
> >> > kernel's tree yet a/o 2.6.8-rc2. So thats the next piece of
> >> > data I need.
> >>
> >> Hi Gene,
> >>
> >>
> >> I believe you'll need forcedeth.c for this one. It's called
> >> "Reverse Engineered nForce Ethernet support", under Device Driver
> >> -> Networking -> Ethernet 10/100 Mbit.
> >
> >Wow, nVidia won't release the specs for a *10/100 ethernet
> > controller*? Having to reverse engineer a network driver is
> > ridiculous in this day and age. I can understand binary-only
> > graphics drivers, there is a lot of valuable IP in there, but this
> > is a freaking network card. What do they expect people to do?
> >
> >Maybe some bad press would set them straight.
> >
> >Lee
>
> Nvidia is immune to bad press, and probably cannot release a thing
> other than some API help due to copyright contracts with the coders
> who wrote their winderz drivers for them, The only cure would be for
> them to hired a couple of dozen programmers of the minimum quality
> the open source programmers exhibit, which I happen to think is top
> notch, and the CEO can only see outgo without compensatory income for
> all that salary, so they contract it out for a known cost, and get
> tied up in restrictive contracts.
>
I am not talking about them releasing driver code, I am just talking
about datasheets so we can write our own driver, something that tells
you which bits to write to which registers to get it to do $FOO.
Their net cost: $0.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-24 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407211334260.3000-100000@mail.birdvet.org>
[not found] ` <40FF4A15.7040100@charter.net>
[not found] ` <200407220652.39575.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
2004-07-22 12:49 ` [FC1], 2.6.8-rc2 kernel, new motherboard problems Gene Heskett
2004-07-22 18:49 ` Nuno Monteiro
2004-07-24 0:55 ` Lee Revell
2004-07-24 5:58 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-24 6:06 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2004-07-24 6:10 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-24 9:29 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-24 9:20 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-24 12:16 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2004-07-24 15:15 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-24 18:01 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1090649207.1006.12.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=gene.heskett@verizon.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox