public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fruhwirth Clemens <clemens-dated-1091653086.2b8e@endorphin.org>
To: Marc Ballarin <Ballarin.Marc@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:58:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1090789085.8623.18.camel@ghanima> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20040725T212435-197@post.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1989 bytes --]

On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 21:44, Marc Ballarin wrote:
> Fruhwirth Clemens <clemens-dated-1091642568.f246 <at> endorphin.org> writes:  
>   
> >   
> > Probably I'm missing the point, but at the moment this looks like a  
> > chosen plain text attack. As you know for sure, this is trivial. For  
> > instance, AES asserts to be secure against this kind of attack. (See the  
> > author's definition of K-secure..).  
>   
> It assures against key revovery through chosen plain text attacks. As written 
> before, the purpose of this attack is not to break encryption, but to prove 
> the existence of a file *known to* and *prepared by* the attacker.  

If an attacker has some means to put a file on the encrypted hard disk,
I'm not considering it a big breakthrough if he can find out the
position of that file. I'm sure this information can be gained by
forensic block access pattern analysis anyway.

> The exploit generates a rather simple bit pattern with a size of 1024 bytes.  
> When this pattern - the watermark - is encrypted, dm-crypt's output has some  
> special properties - independent of cipher or key size.  
> For example, encoding nr. 1, always produces a cyphertext block, where bytes  
> 0-15 are equal to bytes 512-523.  

I'm starting to wonder why this is called an attack. The results of this
``attack'' can't be used in any way. In the worst case, a cipher
text/plain text pair can be obtained. I'm repeating it one more time:
ciphers are designed to resist further attacks steaming from known-plain
text attacks.

Have a look at 
http://clemens.endorphin.org/OnTheProblemsOfCryptoloop . That's an
attack!
  
> On dm-crypt's mailing list, I have given a description how this can be refined  
> easily to improve reliability of detection and determine a file's layout on 
> the encrypted volume.  

I'm sorry, I consider this useless information. 

-- 
Fruhwirth Clemens <clemens@endorphin.org>  http://clemens.endorphin.org

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-25 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-21 20:16 [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop James Morris
2004-07-21 23:44 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-22  6:00 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-22  3:30   ` James Morris
2004-07-22  7:43     ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-07-22 14:14       ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-07-22 14:58         ` Jack Lloyd
2004-07-28 20:24     ` David Wagner
2004-07-29  0:27       ` James Morris
2004-07-29 15:50         ` Christophe Saout
2004-07-29 21:15           ` David Wagner
2004-07-30 13:13             ` Christophe Saout
2004-07-31  0:44               ` David Wagner
2004-07-31  2:05                 ` Matt Mackall
2004-07-31 17:29                   ` Marc Ballarin
2004-08-02 22:54                   ` David Wagner
2004-08-02 23:16                     ` James Morris
2004-08-07 16:27                       ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-07-22  4:26   ` dpf-lkml
2004-07-22  5:22     ` James Morris
2004-07-22 11:58       ` Paul Rolland
2004-07-22 20:40         ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-07-22  8:46     ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-22  6:13       ` Dale Fountain
2004-07-22  6:47         ` Tim Connors
2004-07-22 15:02           ` Petr Baudis
2004-07-22 11:36         ` Aiko Barz
2004-07-24 15:11           ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2004-07-24 15:53       ` gadgeteer
2004-07-29 16:12       ` Andries Brouwer
2004-07-29 17:23         ` James Morris
2004-07-29 19:48           ` Andries Brouwer
2004-07-22 22:13 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-07-24 12:41 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2004-07-24 16:52   ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-24 14:08     ` Andreas Henriksson
2004-07-24 19:54       ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-27 20:02     ` Bill Davidsen
2004-07-25 11:42   ` Jari Ruusu
2004-07-25 13:24     ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2004-07-25 15:24       ` Marc Ballarin
2004-07-25 16:57       ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2004-07-25 17:25       ` Jari Ruusu
2004-07-25 18:02         ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2004-07-25 19:09           ` Lee Revell
2004-07-25 19:15             ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2004-07-25 19:44           ` Marc Ballarin
2004-07-25 20:58             ` Fruhwirth Clemens [this message]
2004-07-26 10:54           ` Jari Ruusu
2004-07-26 12:45             ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2004-07-26 18:11               ` Jari Ruusu
2004-07-26 22:59                 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2004-07-26 20:01               ` Matt Mackall
     [not found]                 ` <fa.edslbgp.q763qd@ifi.uio.no>
2004-07-27  8:40                   ` Junio C Hamano
2004-07-27  8:53                     ` Matt Mackall
2004-07-27 10:10                     ` Marc Ballarin
2004-07-26 22:04               ` Marc Ballarin
2004-07-27 19:56   ` Bill Davidsen
     [not found] <2kMAw-rl-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-07-22 19:44 ` Pascal Brisset
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-23 10:59 Thomas Habets
     [not found] <2kvT4-5AY-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <2kC85-1AH-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <2kDxa-2sB-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <2kECW-3a0-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-07-23 12:34       ` Walter Hofmann
2004-07-23 14:01         ` Kevin Corry
2004-07-23 18:20           ` Christophe Saout
2004-07-27 19:47         ` Bill Davidsen
2004-07-23 12:50 mattia
2004-07-26  7:13 Adam J. Richter
2004-07-30  8:43 Markku-Juhani O. Saarinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1090789085.8623.18.camel@ghanima \
    --to=clemens-dated-1091653086.2b8e@endorphin.org \
    --cc=Ballarin.Marc@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox