From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reduce swsusp casting
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:20:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1091049624.2871.464.camel@nighthawk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0407281405090.31994-100000@monsoon.he.net>
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 14:07, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> > I noticed that swsusp uses quite a few interesting casts for __pa() and
> > cousins. This patch moves some types around to eliminate some of those
> > casts in the normal code. The casts that it adds are around alloc's and
> > frees, which is a much more usual place to see them.
> >
> > Pavel also noticed that there's a superfluous PAGE_ALIGN() right before
> > a >>PAGE_SHIFT in pfn_is_nosave(), so that's been removed as well.
>
> What are these patches against? I released a bunch of patches to swsusp
> and pmdisk two weeks ago. I'm not sure if Andrew has picked them up yet.
> It would be nice if you would patch against those.
It was against 2.6.8-rc1-mm1, but I can patch against whatever. Do you
have those patches consolidated somewhere, or is it best that I look in
the archives?
> > I haven't had a chance to do anything but test it, because that would
> > involve me setting up a swsusp rig, which I'm more prone to screw up
> > than the patch itself :) I'd appreciate if anyone with a stable setup
> > could make sure I didn't do anything too stupid.
>
> I don't understand - have you really tested it or just compile-tested it?
> If not, please do try it out for real. There is no reason to be scared of
> swsusp, and the more people that use it, the more stable it will get.
I'm not scared, just lazy :) I'll give it a shot.
-- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-28 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-28 19:37 [PATCH] reduce swsusp casting Dave Hansen
2004-07-28 21:07 ` Patrick Mochel
2004-07-28 21:20 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2004-07-28 22:27 ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-29 18:31 ` Dave Hansen
2004-07-29 19:17 ` Kevin Fenzi
2004-08-02 6:08 ` Patrick Mochel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1091049624.2871.464.camel@nighthawk \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@digitalimplant.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox