Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc3-O5

Florian Schmidt
2004-08-13T01:08:21Z

On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:55:30 -0400
Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:

> Even if it is not a long non-preemptible section, mlockall-test is
> still doing *something* that causes an xrun in jackd. Maybe
> interrupts are being disabled for a long time. Whatever it is, it
> cannot possibly be a jackd bug, because mlockall by an unrelated,
> normal-priority process causes an xrun in the SCHED_FIFO jackd
> process.

Hmm, yes, that makes sense. I wonder: does mlockall have any influence
on IPC?

Flo

--
Palimm Palimm!