From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
To: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Per kthread freezer flags
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:01:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1091142091.2703.54.camel@desktop.cunninghams> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1091141832.2114.2.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com>
Hi.
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 08:57, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> Well, I've tried the kthread freezer patch against 2.6.8-rc2-mm1 and it
> works fine. However, with kthread freezer applied, suspending and
> resuming is much slower (around 5 seconds slower). Thus, I guess all my
> problems must be related to some specific patch I'm applying against the
> current -bk tree.
Okay. That might be due to the treatment of ksoftirqd, which Pavel and I
have agreed needs changing.
> I'll keep investigating this issue, but I think voluntary-preempt might
> have some strange interactions with these kthread changes.
Me too, when I get a chance. I'm running rc2-mm1 now, and it seems okay.
Especially since I turned off USB 2 support in the BIOS :>
Nigel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-29 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-28 7:22 [Patch] Per kthread freezer flags Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-28 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-28 22:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-28 22:30 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-28 22:27 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-28 22:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-28 23:21 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-29 0:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-29 10:02 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-29 12:11 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-29 16:10 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-29 22:39 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-30 8:12 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-29 22:57 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-29 23:01 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2004-07-29 19:04 ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-29 22:24 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-29 22:44 ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-29 22:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-29 23:25 ` [Patch] Per kthread freezer flags (Version 2) Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-30 9:18 ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-31 16:53 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-30 12:11 ` [Patch] Per kthread freezer flags Peter Osterlund
2004-07-30 22:15 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1091142091.2703.54.camel@desktop.cunninghams \
--to=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox