From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267645AbUG3HQc (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:16:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267654AbUG3HQc (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:16:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:6107 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267649AbUG3HQa (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:16:30 -0400 Subject: Re: symlinks follow 8 or 5? From: Arjan van de Ven Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com To: Tim Connors Cc: FabF , lkml In-Reply-To: References: <1091079278.1999.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-AlrAGt5D/csDTPJyRj1p" Organization: Red Hat UK Message-Id: <1091171770.2794.4.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:16:10 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-AlrAGt5D/csDTPJyRj1p Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Obviously, nothing came about it.=20 you haven't been paying attention.... the current 2.6 kernels have a patch series that is fixing this for most filesystems already with the last few others in progress. --=-AlrAGt5D/csDTPJyRj1p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBCfW6xULwo51rQBIRAl1dAJ9mkGPgoRosFV0xNS48+Aeq5j3twwCeKIwD SKERweyFcUyvbT1jvzs8ULg= =uWXw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-AlrAGt5D/csDTPJyRj1p--