From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267862AbUG3Wdy (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:33:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267861AbUG3Wdx (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:33:53 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.130]:56312 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267859AbUG3Wdt (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:33:49 -0400 Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH] Change pcibus_to_cpumask() to pcibus_to_node() From: Matthew Dobson Reply-To: colpatch@us.ibm.com To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jesse Barnes , Andi Kleen , LKML , "Martin J. Bligh" , LSE Tech In-Reply-To: <200407301521.03422.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> References: <1090887007.16676.18.camel@arrakis> <200407300836.32812.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <1091225824.5925.1.camel@arrakis> <200407301521.03422.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM LTC Message-Id: <1091226799.5925.4.camel@arrakis> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:33:19 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 15:21, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Friday, July 30, 2004 3:17 pm, Matthew Dobson wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 08:36, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > I think this will work. My tree didn't have nodemask_t though, so it > > > didn't compile :) Here's a first stab at an ia64 portion of the patch. > > > > > > Jesse > > > > Andrew picked it up in 2.6.8-rc2-mm1, so if you base your patch against > > that it should compile... That's what I based my patch off. Our lab > > has been down for a few days so I hope to do some testing on Monday for > > my patches. If all goes well, I'll add your code into my patch and > > submit it early next week, ok? > > Sounds good, but it will probably need some fixes before it works correctly > (my stuff I mean), so when you have something that looks good give me a few > minutes with it before you send it on to Andrew if you would. > > Thanks, > Jesse No problem, Jesse. Like I said, with lab machines being decidedly unfriendly, I won't even be able to run any real tests on my code until Monday at the earliest. I'll certainly give you at least 5 minutes warning before I post any untested, potentially dangerous code! ;) -Matt