From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264826AbUHCBBC (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 21:01:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264795AbUHCBAp (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 21:00:45 -0400 Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:51641 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264767AbUHCBAj (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 21:00:39 -0400 Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL (fwd) From: Alan Cox To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20040803004509.GW2746@fs.tum.de> References: <20040802225951.GR2746@fs.tum.de> <20040802162846.3929e463.akpm@osdl.org> <20040803004509.GW2746@fs.tum.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1091490958.1647.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 00:56:01 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Maw, 2004-08-03 at 01:45, Adrian Bunk wrote: > OTOH, at least XFS is known to have problems with 4kb stacks - and you > don't want such problems to occur in production environments. So put && !4KSTACKS in the XFS configuration ?