From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266796AbUHCSeP (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:34:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266806AbUHCSeO (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:34:14 -0400 Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:24252 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266796AbUHCSeJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:34:09 -0400 Subject: Re: dma problems with Serverworks CSB5 chipset From: Alan Cox To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Richard Wohlstadter , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz In-Reply-To: <20040803180821.GB6265@logos.cnet> References: <4107E4B3.6070904@watson.wustl.edu> <20040803180821.GB6265@logos.cnet> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1091554289.3898.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 18:31:33 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Maw, 2004-08-03 at 19:08, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > ServerWorks OSB4/5 chipsets are known to not work reliably with the Linux > IDE code. AFAIK its a hardware problem which we dont correctly work around. > > Have you tried disabling DMA? > > Bart and Alan are IDE experts, they can probably give you more useful > information. CSB5 is reliable, rock solidly so in my experience. OSB4 was the older interface with problems. Are these systems SMP, what disks are you using and in what IDE mode ?